International Consensus Initiative in Invasive Physiotherapy (ICI-IP): Protocol for an Evidence-Informed Delphi Study on Percutaneous Neuromodulation and Percutaneous Electrolysis

You have full access to this open access article

Downloads

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous neuromodulation and percutaneous electrolysis are increasingly used in physiotherapy for the management of musculoskeletal conditions. However, substantial variability exists in their clinical application, including differences in indications, technical parameters, safety procedures, and integration within multimodal care. Currently, no unified, evidence-informed framework defines best practice for these interventions.

Methods: This protocol describes an evidence-informed modified Delphi study, registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF; registration number: osf.io/tkrn4), aiming to establish international consensus on the clinical application of percutaneous neuromodulation and percutaneous electrolysis. The study will be conducted in accordance with CREDES recommendations. Two parallel Delphi processes will be undertaken, with international experts in each field participating in 3–4 online rounds. An initial item set will be developed through a targeted literature review and internal expert input, and rated using a Likert-type scale with controlled feedback between rounds. Consensus for inclusion will be predefined using percentage agreement and median thresholds.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted by the CEIC Aragón (CEICA), Zaragoza, Spain (reference: PI26/238, 20 May 2026). The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and relevant professional channels.

Discussion: This study is expected to provide structured, consensus-based recommendations to support consistency, safety, and evidence-informed clinical practice in invasive physiotherapy, and to guide future research and educational initiatives.

References

  1. Plaza-Manzano G, Gómez-Chiguano GF, Cleland JA, Arías-Buría JL, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Navarro-Santana MJ. Effectiveness of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Pain. 2020;24(6):1023–44. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1559
  2. Rodríguez-Sanz J, Rodríguez-Rodríguez S, López-de-Celis C, Malo-Urriés M, Pérez-Amodio S, Pérez-Antoñanzas R, et al. Biological and Cellular Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines. 2024;12(12):2818. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122818
  3. Asensio-Olea L, Leirós-Rodríguez R, Marqués-Sánchez MP, de Carvalho FO, Maciel LYS. Efficacy of percutaneous electrolysis for the treatment of tendinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2023;37(6):747–59. doi: 10.1177/02692155221144272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221144272
  4. Badia M, Figueroa J, Penagos P, Carcasona-Otal A. Effect of Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation on Active Muscle Functionality. A Systematic Review. Invasive Physiotherapy and Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2025;1. doi: 10.63360/ipmm.v1.e11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63360/ipmm.v1.e11
  5. Guerrero Troyano J. Aplicación de la Estimulación Eléctrica Nerviosa Percutánea (PENS) en trastornos musculoesqueléticos: una revisión narrativa. Invasive Physiotherapy and Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2025;1. doi: 10.63360/ipmm.v1.e8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63360/ipmm.v1.e8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Giorgos Tzigkounakis, Zaid Alboloushi, Katerina Simati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.