Clinical differentiation of spasticity and spastic dystonia after chronic stroke using surface electromyography: a case series

You have full access to this open access article

Downloads

Abstract

Introduction: Spasticity affects a large number of stroke patients, limiting their mobility and autonomy. Surface electromyography (sEMG) is the most suitable option for quantifying spasticity and differentiating it from other phenomena. Despite evidence of dry needling's effect on spasticity, it has not been quantified using sEMG, nor have other patterns of muscle overactivity been explored.

Case presentation: Four cases of patients with chronic stroke and spasticity are presented, who received intensive therapy for 4 weeks, combined with a weekly session of ultrasound-guided dry needling in the medial gastrocnemius muscle. Muscle activity was evaluated using sEMG at rest and during stretching, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and walking tests at the start of the study (T0), after the first dry needling session (T1), and at the end of the treatment (T2). Different phenotypes were identified based on electromyographic activity: high activity during stretching, high variability, high activity at rest and during stretching, and a combination of the above.

Results: Electromyographic activity during stretching was reduced in cases with high response and variability to stretching without spastic dystonia, while resting activity was reduced in those cases that did present spastic dystonia. The MAS scale improved in all patients, and walking tests exceeded clinically significant thresholds. No adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion: A theoretical-practical framework is proposed for assessing muscle tone with sEMG, describing different clinical phenotypes in patients with chronic stroke and supporting the combination of dry needling and intensive therapy to improve both spasticity and gait.

References

García-Campanario I, Vinolo-Gil MJ. Prevalence of Stroke in Spain and Its Impact on Quality of Life: Socioeconomic Inequalities and Access to Rehabilitation. Healthcare (Basel). 2025;13(9):1075. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13091075

Amaya Pascasio L, Blanco Ruiz M, Milán Pinilla R, García Torrecillas JM, Arjona Padillo A, Del Toro Pérez C, et al. Stroke in Young Adults in Spain: Epidemiology and Risk Factors by Age. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):768. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050768

Zeng H, Chen J, Guo Y, Tan S. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Spasticity After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2021;11 : doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.616097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.616097

Sommerfeld DK, Eek EUB, Svensson AK, Holmqvist LW, Von Arbin MH. Spasticity after Stroke: Its Occurrence and Association with Motor Impairments and Activity Limitations. Stroke. 2004;35(1):134–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000105386.05173.5E DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000105386.05173.5E

Simić-Panić D, Bošković K, Milićević M, Žikić TR, Bošnjak MC, Tomaševic-Todorović S, et al. The impact of comorbidity on rehabilitation outcome after ischemic stroke. Acta Clin Croat. 2018;57(1):5–15. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.01.01

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Daniel Jiménez Masa, Javier Sánchez Aguilar, Pablo Herrero Gallego

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.